|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Family CEOs vs. Nonfamily CEOs in the Family-Controlled Firm: An Examination of the Level and Sensitivity of Pay to Performance
Daniel L. McConaughy
Department of Finance and the director of the Family Business Center at the College of Business Administration and Economics at California State University, Northridge
This study examines CEO compensation in 82 founding-family-controlled firms; 47 CEOs are members of the founding family and 35 are not. It tests the family incentive alignment hypothesis, which predicts that family CEOs have superior incentives for maximizing firm value and, therefore, need fewer compensation-based incentives. Univariate and multivariate analyses show that family CEOs' compensation levels are lower and that they receive less incentive-based pay—confirming the family incentive alignment hypothesis and suggesting the possible need for family firms to increase CEO compensation when they replace a founding family CEO with a nonfamily-member CEO.
Family Business Review, Vol. 13, No. 2,
121-131 (2000)
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2000.00121.x

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Basco and M. J. Perez Rodriguez
Studying the Family Enterprise Holistically: Evidence for Integrated Family and Business Systems
Family Business Review,
March 1, 2009;
22(1):
82 - 95.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. P. Blumentritt, A. D. Keyt, and J. H. Astrachan
Creating an Environment for Successful Nonfamily CEOs: An Exploratory Study of Good Principals
Family Business Review,
December 1, 2007;
20(4):
321 - 335.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Hadani
Family Matters: Founding Family Firms and Corporate Political Activity
Business Society,
December 1, 2007;
46(4):
395 - 428.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Gibb Dyer Jr
Examining the "Family Effect" on Firm Performance
Family Business Review,
December 1, 2006;
19(4):
253 - 273.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.-H. Tsai, J.-H. Hung, Y.-C. Kuo, and L. Kuo
CEO Tenure in Taiwanese Family and Nonfamily Firms: An Agency Theory Perspective
Family Business Review,
March 1, 2006;
19(1):
11 - 28.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Sharma
An Overview of the Field of Family Business Studies: Current Status and Directions for the Future
Family Business Review,
March 1, 2004;
17(1):
1 - 36.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. Chua, J. J. Chrisman, and P. Sharma
Succession and Nonsuccession Concerns of Family Firms and Agency Relationship with Nonfamily Managers
Family Business Review,
June 1, 2003;
16(2):
89 - 107.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. F. Adams III, S. L. True, and R. D. Winsor
Corporate America's Search for the "Right" Direction: Outlook and Opportunities for Family Firms
Family Business Review,
December 1, 2002;
15(4):
269 - 276.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. G. Habbershon and J. Pistrui
Enterprising Families Domain: Family-Influenced Ownership Groups in Pursuit of Transgenerational Wealth
Family Business Review,
September 1, 2002;
15(3):
223 - 237.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|