This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Westhead, P. Articles by Howorth, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Development of Family Companies: Management and Ownership Imperatives

Institute for Enterprise and Innovation, Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham, England

Marc Cowling

Research Centre for Industrial Strategy, The Birmingham Business School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England

Carole Howorth

Institute for Enterprise and Innovation, Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham, England

This study explores management and ownership imperatives facing 427 independent unquoted (i.e., nonpublic) companies in the United Kingdom. To detect real rather than sample differences, the study used a matched pairs methodology. Chi-square and student's T-tests confirmed several similarities among the 73 family companies and the comparable 73 nonfamily companies. The tenure periods of CEOs in both groups of firms before being appointed to the CEO position were similar. CEOs in family firms had not remained in this position for significantly longer periods than CEOs in nonfamily firms, and the majority of directors in family and nonfamily firms did not hold outside directorships in other companies. Several significant differences were also detected. CEOs from the kinship group owning the family business had been in the CEO position for much longer than "outside" CEOs in family firms. Furthermore, the proportion of total shares owned by directors in family firms was significantly more than the proportion owned by directors in nonfamily firms. A significantly larger proportion of nonfamily rather than family firms had employed a nonexecutive director. In concluding, it is highlighted that a firm's identification of itself as a family firm is important in defining family firms and that firms that do not currently perceive themselves to be family firms may in the future.

Family Business Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, 369-385 (2001)
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00369.x


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. C. Short, G. T. Payne, K. H. Brigham, G.T. Lumpkin, and J. C. Broberg Family Firms and Entrepreneurial Orientation in Publicly Traded Firms: A Comparative Analysis of the S&P 500 Family Business Review, March 1, 2009; 22(1): 9 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Wang, P. Ahmed, and S. Farquhar Founders versus Descendants: The Profitability, Growth and Efficiency Characteristics Comparison in the UK Small and Medium Sized Family Businesses Journal of Entrepreneurship, July 1, 2007; 16(2): 173 - 195. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Westhead and C. Howorth Ownership and Management Issues Associated With Family Firm Performance and Company Objectives Family Business Review, December 1, 2006; 19(4): 301 - 316. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Sharma An Overview of the Field of Family Business Studies: Current Status and Directions for the Future Family Business Review, March 1, 2004; 17(1): 1 - 36. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Westhead Succession Decision-Making Outcomes Reported by Private Family Companies International Small Business Journal, November 1, 2003; 21(4): 369 - 401. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. F. Adams III, S. L. True, and R. D. Winsor Corporate America's Search for the "Right" Direction: Outlook and Opportunities for Family Firms Family Business Review, December 1, 2002; 15(4): 269 - 276. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. M. Levenburg Family Business Goals in the Tourism and Hospitality Sector: Case Studies and Cross-Case Analysis from Australia, Canada, and Sweden by Tommy Andersson, Jack Carlsen, Donald Getz Family Business Review, June 1, 2002; 15(2): 107 - 109. [PDF]

				Y. Bhagwat The Role of Going Public in Family Businesses' Long-Lasting Growth: A Study of Italian IPOs by Pietro Mazzola, Gaia Marchisio Family Business Review, June 1, 2002; 15(2): 149 - 151. [PDF]