|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Family Governance and Firm Performance: Agency, Stewardship, and Capabilities
Danny Miller
HEC Montreal and University of Alberta, 4642 Melrose Ave., Montreal, Danny.Miller{at}hec.ca
Isabelle Le Breton-Miller
Faculty of Business, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, LeBreton{at}generation.net
After decades of being viewed as obsolete and problem ridden, recent research has begun to show that major, publicly traded family-controlled businesses (FCBs) actually out-perform other types of businesses. This article examines the nature of such family businesses in an attempt to explain why some seem to do so well and others so poorly. It begins with four fundamental governance choices that distinguish among different kinds of family businesses: level and mode of family ownership, family leadership, the broader involvement of multiple family members, and the planned or actual participation of later generations. Using precepts from agency and stewardship theory, it relates these dimensions to the nature of the resource-allocation decisions made by the business and capability development, which in turn have implications for financial performance. Propositions are drawn about the drivers that make some family businesses great competitors—while leaving others at a disadvantage.
Family Business Review, Vol. 19, No. 1,
73-87 (2006)
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00063.x

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-W. Tsao, S.-J. Chen, C.-S. Lin, and W. Hyde
Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: The Role of High-Performance Work Systems
Family Business Review,
December 1, 2009;
22(4):
319 - 332.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-L. Chen and W.-T. Hsu
Family Ownership, Board Independence, and R&D Investment
Family Business Review,
December 1, 2009;
22(4):
347 - 362.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Claver, L. Rienda, and D. Quer
Family Firms' International Commitment: The Influence of Family-Related Factors
Family Business Review,
June 1, 2009;
22(2):
125 - 135.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Lambrecht and J. Lievens
Pruning the Family Tree: An Unexplored Path to Family Business Continuity and Family Harmony
Family Business Review,
December 1, 2008;
21(4):
295 - 313.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sciascia and P. Mazzola
Family Involvement in Ownership and Management: Exploring Nonlinear Effects on Performance
Family Business Review,
December 1, 2008;
21(4):
331 - 345.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Prencipe, G. Markarian, and L. Pozza
Earnings Management in Family Firms: Evidence From R&D Cost Capitalization in Italy
Family Business Review,
March 1, 2008;
21(1):
71 - 88.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Nicholson
Evolutionary Psychology and Family Business: A New Synthesis for Theory, Research, and Practice
Family Business Review,
March 1, 2008;
21(1):
103 - 118.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Pieper and S. B. Klein
The Bulleye: A Systems Approach to Modeling Family Firms
Family Business Review,
December 1, 2007;
20(4):
301 - 319.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. P. Blumentritt, A. D. Keyt, and J. H. Astrachan
Creating an Environment for Successful Nonfamily CEOs: An Exploratory Study of Good Principals
Family Business Review,
December 1, 2007;
20(4):
321 - 335.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Blanco-Mazagatos, E. de Quevedo-Puente, and L. A. Castrillo
The Trade-Off Between Financial Resources and Agency Costs in the Family Business: An Exploratory Study
Family Business Review,
September 1, 2007;
20(3):
199 - 213.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Craig and C. Dibrell
The Natural Environment, Innovation, and Firm Performance: A Comparative Study
Family Business Review,
December 1, 2006;
19(4):
275 - 288.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|